In which of the following scenarios might an officer use intermediate weapons?

The use of intermediate weapons by an officer is typically justified in situations where the application of force is necessary to gain control over a suspect who is resisting arrest. In the scenario of resistance to lawful arrest, intermediate weapons serve as a crucial tool to de-escalate a potentially dangerous situation while ensuring the safety of both the officer and the suspect. Intermediate weapons, which may include batons, pepper spray, or other non-lethal devices, are designed to provide a range of response options that fall between verbal commands and lethal force. This approach aligns with the principles of using proportionality and minimizing harm during law enforcement encounters.

In contrast, situations such as street racing or verbal arguments generally do not warrant the use of intermediate weapons as they do not typically involve active resistance or threats to safety that necessitate such measures. Similarly, the issuance of a summons is an administrative action that does not involve the confrontation of individuals in a manner that would prompt the need for intermediate weapons. Therefore, the scenario involving resistance to lawful arrest stands out as the appropriate context for the use of intermediate weapons.